|
Al Qaeda has a nuke devise stamped "Made in Pakistan"
Reports that Abu Musab Zarqawi, al Qaeda's top honcho in Iraq, now has a nuclear device or a radiological weapon -- so-called
"dirty" bomb -- are hardly news.
But in Washington, where institutional memories, or any kind of memories, are scarce, old news is recycled daily as the scoop
du jour. Just last February, CIA Director Porter J. Goss warned Congress there could be such an attack at any time. What do
we know and how long have we known it? The record:

The Marines found in Kabul's al Qaeda safe houses after the fall of the Taliban regime detailed drawings showing how to marry
the ingredients of a radiological bomb. In his last message before the defeat of the Taliban regime in November 2001,
Mullah Omar said nobody could begin to realize the devastation that would soon incinerate the United States. Omar was
probably reflecting what his companion-in-crime bin Laden told him had been obtained from the nuclear team from Pakistan.
That the Jihadis have not yet struck the US with nukes or Dirty Bomb, need not be a solace for us. The patience of the
Jihadis is phenomenal, and they can wait for year till the right moment for a dramatic attack. Against such an enemy, we need
to be always proactive and pre-emptive.
(Photo credits : VOA News) _____________________________
• Three months before September 11, 2001, two Pakistani nuclear scientists were in Kandahar conferring with Taliban leader
Mullah Omar and Osama bin Laden. When United Press International broke the story, Pakistan said their three-week visit to
Afghanistan had been to advise the Taliban government on "agricultural business."
• On Oct. 23, 2001, at the request of the Bush administration, these two scientists were detained for questioning about their
activities in Afghanistan. Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood, former director of a nuclear reactor, and his associate Chaudri Abdul
Majid, failed their polygraph tests.
• Pakistan said the two lacked the know-how to help al Qaeda develop nuclear weapons. But that was a given. What bin Laden
sought was help in developing a dirty bomb -- nuclear materials wrapped in conventional high explosives. Bin Laden told them
he had managed to obtain old Soviet fissile materials from Uzbekistan.
• In his last message before the defeat of the Taliban regime in November 2001, Mullah Omar said nobody could begin to
realize the devastation that would soon incinerate the United States. Omar was probably reflecting what his
companion-in-crime bin Laden told him had been obtained from the nuclear Mutt and Jeff team from Pakistan.
• Two other Pakistani nuclear scientists also traveled to Kabul the month before Operation Enduring Freedom. When news of
this visit broke, the government said they were unavailable for questioning, as they were both in Burma on another
"agricultural project."
• All four were known as al Qaeda and Taliban sympathizers. Mahmood even said, "The ideal form of government for Pakistan was
Taliban," the regime that took Afghanistan back to the obscurantism of the Middle Ages.
• In 1987, Mahmood published a 232-page essay titled, "Doomsday and Life after Death -- the Ultimate Fate of the Universe as
Seen Through the Holy Koran." In another article in 1998, titled "Cosmology and Human Destiny," he wrote about the
correlation of sunspot activity and the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution and World Wars I and II. He was clearly
ahead of his time and gave a new definition to the long gloomy view of history. Sample: "At the international level,
terrorism will rule, and in this scenario use of weapons of mass destruction [WMD] cannot be ruled out. By 2002, millions may
die through WMD, hunger, disease, street violence, terrorist attacks and suicides."
• All four scientists had been close associates of A.Q. Khan, the Pakistani nuclear black marketeer who made a fortune
selling nuclear wherewithal to America's enemies -- North Korea, Iran and Libya. The "dirty" four presumably decided it was
OK to add two more U.S. enemies -- Taliban and al Qaeda.
• Mahmood resigned from the Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) in 1999 to protest what he perceived to be the government's
willingness to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). He then launched a campaign to denounce CTBT and advocated
extensive production of weapons-grade plutonium and uranium to help other Islamic nations develop nuclear weapons. They would
then know how to defend themselves against American and Israeli heathen crusaders bent on destroying Islam. Mahmood also made
clear Pakistan's nuclear arsenal was the property of the whole Ummah (the global Muslim community). His public pronouncements
piqued U.S. ire and Washington asked for his removal.
• PAEC officials praised Mahmood publicly after his retirement to say this former key player of Pakistan's nuclear buildup
made significant contributions to his country's reactor programs and uranium enrichment. With a 1965 master's degree in
nuclear engineering from the U.K., he became prominent after developing a technique in the 1970s to detect heavy water leaks
at a nuclear power reactor near Karachi.
• After his forced resignation from PAEC, Mahmood and Majid established Ummah Tameer-e-Nau (UTN), or "Reconstruction of the
Muslim Ummah," whose stated mission was "investment" in Afghanistan.
• Found in Kabul's al Qaeda safe houses after the fall of the Taliban regime were drawings showing how to marry the
ingredients of a radiological bomb.
If anyone still believes the radioactive pair traveled to Afghanistan for an "ag" project, there is a bridge for sale -- over
the Hindu Kush. Of course, al Qaeda has a dirty bomb capability. The terrorist attacks in America on September 11, 2001, also
proved Osama's Terror Inc. thinks big. What, in bin Laden's terrorist vision, could achieve what he publicly avows seeking --
the same fate for America in Iraq as the Soviets' in Afghanistan? Rendering downtown Washington or the Pentagon and the Green
Zone in Baghdad radioactive and uninhabitable with dirty bombs is plausible and realistic.
The news from one of Pakistan's neighbors was not reassuring. Iran, whose nuclear weapons efforts were boosted by A.Q. Khan's
expensive ministrations over the last 18 years, will have a new president next July -- who could well be former President
Hashemi Rafsanjani. Some Iranian experts in America see him as the kind of moderate "we can do business with." Perhaps the
Ayatollah Rajsanjani's latest pronouncement meets the criterion of "radical moderate":
"The teachings of Jesus do not exist in the Christian world today. Those who ignore the crimes America commits all over the
world cannot serve as popes. It's true they opposed the war on Iraq, but then ignored what America does all over the world in
the name of the war on terrorism, the way in which it plunders the resources of peoples in needy and backward countries, its
aggression in international organizations, which belong to all of the world's peoples, and the inflammatory propaganda it
uses to undermine other countries -- all of these certainly contradict the teachings of Jesus."
Israel's Ariel Sharon told President Bush on his last visit he was concerned the expected 2006 U.S. withdrawal from Iraq
would increase regional tensions that could lead to another Middle East war. Israeli intelligence sees Iran either leading or
playing a major role in any future war against the Jewish state. The Israeli assessment is that, emboldened by nuclear
weapons and medium-range missiles and U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, Iran may be tempted to lead its own coalition of the willing
against the US and Israel. All this would sound incredulous today as it did before 9/11 when nobody would believe that
Terrorists could stage a Hollywood style dramatic attack in our premier metropolis to take off the signature of our Manhattan
skyline. The 9/11 commission said we had a "Failure of Imagination"
A similar psyche is at work now, we will never believe that the Jihadis have nukes, till they strike. Just watch these words,
they will prove right someday. And then we will all be wise in HINDSIGHT. Can we prevent history from repeating itself, by
striking out at the nuclear or nuclear-aspiring Jihadis starting with Iran, before they strike at us?
Story Credits: Benador Associates
|