UN in hurry to pillory US at nuclear arms control meeting

The Islamofascist-Leftist (Arab-Latam) axis is throwing its weight around in the UN, to pillory the US, as was evident in recently concluded month long conference of the 188 parties to the 1970 Non-Proliferation Treaty.

"The chances (of success) are very slim," said Abdul Minty, head of South Africa's delegation, "There is a big divide ... The U.S. is developing new nuclear weapons and we want to know against whom."

The point which the participants chose to ignore was the reasons why nuclear weapons are dangerous when they are in a Mullahs hands but harmless when they are with leaders of democracies Sharon, Bush or Blair….. or for that matter even with Putin, Jiang, Manmohan or even the phlegmatic Chirac, since they are al non-Muslims and do not take their motivation from the Instruction manual of Terror, Slaughter, Rape and Murder (the Quran).

The nuclear weapons are not dangerous by themselves, it is the mindset of those in whose hands they reside is what makes them dangerous or otherwise. Saddam and Khameini, (or Musharraf, Prince Fahd, Mubarak and god knows how many other Muslim despots) have or are on the verge of having nuclear weapons.

Omega

_____________________

The U.N.-sponsored conference, which began on May 2 and ended on Friday May 27, bogged down from the start in wrangling over the agenda and allocation of work among committees. The dispute between Iran and the United States over what Washington sees as Tehran's atomic weapons ambitions dominated the proceedings.

Jonathan Granoff, president of U.S.-based Global Security Institute, assailed the Bush administration for renouncing the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which Washington signed during the Clinton administration but had not ratified. The U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Bush administration would never agree to a pact like the test ban treaty "that limits our options in a state of war."

Some analysts condemned this as irresponsible. "The principle that the U.S. is establishing is that governments can renege on the commitments of their predecessors in office," observed Joseph Cinincione, an arms expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

The point which the participants chose to ignore was the reasons why nuclear weapons are dangerous when they are in a Mullahs hands but harmless when they are with leaders of democracies Sharon, Bush or Blair….. or for that matter even with Putin, Jiang, Manmohan or even the phlegmatic Chirac, since they are al non-Muslims and do not take their motivation from the Instruction manual of Terror, Slaughter, Rape and Murder (the Quran).

The nuclear weapons are not dangerous by themselves, it is the mindset of those in whose hands they reside is what makes them dangerous or otherwise. Saddam and Khameini, (or Musharraf, Prince Fahd, Mubarak and god knows how many other Muslim despots) have or are on the verge of having nuclear weapons. Muslims are the most violent specimens of religious fanaticism. This is not to say that fanatics of other religious persuasions are angels. There are other specimens of negative and socially destructive human behavior too. But all said and done all of them are far less dangerous than the bloodthirsty Muslims who are out to terrorize the world into submission to Islam. And so nuclear weapons in the hands of those with an Islamic mindset is what makes the WMDs dangerous.

A fanatic belonging to any religion may appear to be human in his/her physical form, but all of them have the temperament of wild animals. The way a wild animal attacks and kills its adversary, the most violent among the religious fanatics will go to the extent of killing another person, if he/she does not agree to convert to the religion of the fanatic. Needless to tell you that the most Vicious among the religious fanatics call themselves – Muslims. And what Saddam has in common with Musharraf, Prince Fahd and the Ayatollahs - is Islam; something which Saddam does not have in common with Ariel Sharon, George Bush, Tony Blair, Vladimir Putin, Jiang Jemin or Jacques Chirac – although all of them have WMDs under their control.

The Real WMD is the mind of the Theology-inspired Terrorist

While there is and will be talk of limiting the possession of nuclear weapons, we say that it is this Instruction Manual of Terrorism that has made the mind of every practicing Muslim a Weapon of Mass Destruction! A weapon that the free world cannot allow to cause further destruction. Yes all fanatics are bad enough be they Christian, Jewish, Hindu or Communist. But then a Muslim is programmed to be the most violent and cruel among all in addition to being the most well organized globally into terrorist networks lavishly financed by petrodollars.

We in the Western world better realize real fast that we are up against a beastly enemy who has no qualms for foul methods of warfare. The need of the hour is to realize that while our methods of warfare and outlook towards life has undergone a sea-change since the Crusades, that of our Muslim adversaries is still very much the same as it was during the days of Prophet Mohammed. But even so, we cannot expect our forces to emulate what our ancestors did during the crusades when combating this enemy. But we need to remember that the zeal which Peter the Hermit infused in the Coalition which made up the first Crusade is what gave the much needed killer instinct to make the first Crusade victorious. And when we faltered due to the chivalry of Richard the Lionheart we had to face defeat at the hands of Saladin.

Story Credits: Yahoo News and News on Terror

__________________________________________________

Discuss this article