|
Is Europe Waiting to Explode into a Civil War?
The nations that only a few generations ago tried to impose their
culture on large parts of the planet are now afraid of enforcing
their cultural values even in their own lands. We are talking about
the nations of Europe like France, Netherlands, Germany, UK, Spain.
A scene during the Bradford Riots in UK: The question today is with
the increasing Muslim population in Europe, how will the other
Europeans (and the Americans) react if or when the first European
nation breaks down in civil war because of Muslim internal aggression
as was seen at Bradford some years back? Will they sacrifice the non-
Muslims out of fear of a widening conflict, bomb the infidels into
submission and establish a de facto Muslim state in a vain attempt to
save themselves? Some would argue that is what happened in the
Balkans in the 1990s. The answer probably depends upon which
nation breaks down first. If it turns out to be nuclear armed France,
the reactions may be different from what it would be with Holland,
Belgium or Sweden. If Islamofascist Jihadis get their hands on French
nukes, they will then use these weapons as a nuclear umbrella with
which to establish sharia in different parts of Europe. This cannot
be allowed to happen.
Photo credits:
BBC News ____________________________
Historian Bat Ye'or fears that it may already be too late to save
Europe from Islam, and that the continent will be transformed into
Eurabia. Should this come to pass, Eurabia will either slowly decline
into just another overpopulated Islamic failure, or it will be used
as a staging ground for Islamic aggression against the rest of the
infidel world. With Europe's nuclear weapons and accumulated
resources at disposal, Eurabia would be so dangerous that the
Americans, the Israelis, the Indians, the Russians and maybe even the
Chinese would be forced to crush it. According to this scenario,
Islam will fall, but it will drag Europe down with it. This is not,
however, the only possibility.
Some Americans have a stereotypical view of Europeans as being
appeasers. There is definitely an appeasement instinct in Europe, but
it is first and foremost a continent of extremes, sometimes changing
in rapid succession. The ruthless nationalism of the past has been
subdued and replaced with anemic multiculturalism and naïve pacifism.
It won't last. The pendulum will swing back. If it appears as if the
mainstream authorities are incapable of taking action to stop the
ongoing Islamic invasion of the continent, faith in the entire
democratic system could break down. Europe right now has all the
ingredients needed for the rise of something akin to a new European
youth movement with its anger directed at the Muslim domination and
criminalization of European society, and with a valid reason
too. It is an extremely dangerous mix of suppressed
nationalism, high unemployment and failed economies, democratic
detachment and a widespread sense of being betrayed by the ruling
elites. Tens of
millions of immigrants pour into Europe, changing the face of the
continent forever without any real debate about the issue. People
feel like strangers in their own cities, but are being silenced
as "racists" if they object to this.
There is a widespread feeling that Europe is descending into chaos,
and that the governments are unwilling or incapable of stopping this.
If this situation continues, some people will cry out for a Strong
Man to "cleanse Europe of foreigners" and restore its honor and
wounded pride. And He will step forward. There is never any shortage
of self-proclaimed Strong Men once you call for them. By then, you
won't have a "Clash of Civilizations" in Europe, but rather a Clash
of Fascisms: Euro-Fascism vs. Islamo-Fascism. Ayaan Hirsi Ali
fears that if we don't take effective measures, now, ''the
Netherlands could be torn between two extreme rights'': an Islamic
one and a non-Islamic one." She's right. MP Geert Wilders in Holland
has proposed a moratorium on all non-Western immigration to the
Netherlands for some years. Perhaps that is an approach that should
be adopted by other European nations, too. Major cities across the
continent are now powder kegs of ethnic and religious tensions, built
up after decades of failed immigration policies and an absence of a
genuine debate. Common sense says that when you have a powder keg
waiting to explode, adding even more powder is not the smartest thing
to do.
How will the other Europeans (and the Americans) react if or when the
first EU European nation breaks down in civil war because of Muslim
immigration? Will they sacrifice the non-Muslims out of fear of a
widening conflict, bomb the infidels into submission and establish a
de facto Muslim state in a vain attempt to save themselves? Some
would argue that is what happened in the Balkans in the 1990s. The
answer probably depends upon which nation breaks down first. If it
turns out to be nuclear armed France, the reactions may be different
from what it would be with Holland, Belgium or Sweden. If
Islamofascist Jihadis get their hands on French nukes, they will then
use these weapons as a nuclear umbrella with which to establish
sharia in different parts of Europe. This cannot be allowed to
happen.
Some would argue that this bleaker picture does not fit my prediction
that Islam will not survive this century as a force of any
significance. That's not necessarily true. We should remain
confident that in the battle of Islam against Humanity, civilization
will eventually triumph. After all victory or defeat begin in the
mind. I will again postulate that Islam will have faded off the
world stage by the end of this century, and that the process should
be apparent by mid-century, or even before. Seen in a historical
perspective, this is a fast demise for a religion that has existed
for 1400 years. But it still means that the Islamic world will remain
extremely volatile and unstable for decades or even generations to
come. It is highly unlikely that there will be an Islamic
Reformation. Islam does not have a natural separation between the
temporal and the spiritual as Christianity does, nor the non-violent
personal example of Jesus, nor the ethical teachings of the Bible. In
the unlikely event that somebody should manage to reform Islam, this
process will take time and probably be quite bloody. The Christian
Reformation was not exactly bloodless with the Inquisition, while it
was going on. There is no reason to expect an Islamic Reformation to
be, either if at all it happens without an extremely violent war
against Islam.
The good news is that Islam is not capable of achieving the world
dominance it desires. The bad news is that it may well be capable of
achieving a world war. Perhaps Islam will not "go quietly into the
night", but push for a final, decisive confrontation. Islam has lived
by the sword, and may die by it. We need to brace ourselves for
decades of turbulence ahead. This is unavoidable by now, as the
Islamic world will struggle, and probably fail, to come to terms with
the modern world. We have to observe how that the new "Cold War"
turns into a hot, cataclysmic world war and facilitate to make that
process of conclusion of the Hot War quick and decisive. We
can perhaps speed up the process, by translating a selection of the
best Islam-critical literature available to major languages, spread
them across the Internet and encourage downloading and free
reprinting of the books to reach those without Internet connection.
Other spending on Muslims should be avoided as much as possible. We
cannot buy Muslim goodwill, even if we try. Economic aid to Muslims
will be viewed as Jizya, the tributary tax non-Muslim dhimmis should
pay as a sign of submission to Islamic rule.
Continued Muslim immigration will eventually lead to the demise of
European democracy, either by the establishment of a Muslim-lead
totalitarian entity, Eurabia, or disintegration of Europe, with
different fascist groups competing for the spoils. The only way we
can avoid this is by separation, by ending and reversing Muslim
immigration.
Muslim immigration is equivalent to playing Russian roulette with
your own children. The worst case scenario is that the current trends
continue unabated, triggering civil wars in several nations as the
Muslim population reaches critical mass for an armed Jihad.
A Balkanization of the continent would ensue. It may already be too
late for the worst hit areas of Europe, but still not for the
continent as whole. If we get an Islamic nuclear attack against an
American city on top of this, events could spiral out of control. We
need to be prepared for this. Swift action needs to be taken as soon
as possible. It is unclear whether our politicians have the foresight
and the courage to do what is necessary to avoid the impending
disaster. Time is sadly not on our side.
Story Credits: Wolfgang
Bruno writing at Faithfreedom
__________________________________________________
Discuss this article
|
