This site is dedicated to
frank and fearless reporting and commenting to expose the Islamic
|Friday, September 9, 2005
theology-inspired Islamic terrorism
With the Quran setting the principles for forcible conversion of all
non-Muslims to Islam and using coercion of treating non-Muslims like
2nd class beings, the base is prepared for the Madaressahs (Islamic
theological-terrorism schools) to inculcate these Quranic principles
into the minds of every growing generation of Muslims to have this
attitude of paranoid coercion. Further at every prayer
(Ibadat/Namaz), the Muslim priest (Maulavi) preaches the practice of
terror to his audience. This is how a terrorist is born. So the
Quran, and what is preached in the Madaressahs and the Mosques are
the real origin of terrorism. And until the world over, we do not
eradicate these, the problem of terrorism will not end.
billion and half of those who take their inspiration from the Quran
have the same murderous instinct. The difference is that in some the
opportunity does not present itself to execute their instinct. The
instinct does not differ. And in some discretion is the better part
of valor, but there to the instinct is same. As the case is so
hopeless, the only hope of breaking this circle of hate is by
delivering a message in kind to all the billion and a half Muslims
that would disabuse them of any hope for victory over us with their
method of murder and mayhem. We need to be prepared for this as soon
there will come a point when widespread Muslim terror attacks against
the U.S. will no longer allow military actions as we have taken in
Iraq and Afghanistan and will call for a re-appraisal of our military
strategy. A re-appraisal as happened during World War 2 when the
allies in 1939 began by bombarding Germany with pamphlets asking the
Germans to make peace, to the bombing of Dresden to rubble in 1945.
It took six years during the last World War to bring about this
change. How long will it take now? And in what circumstances now do
we reach that point? Here's the dilemma: to have any hope of victory
over the Jihadis, we must use a terrible, overwhelming, and insidious
force; yet, in using that force we risk losing popular support for
the war effort.
Victory requires a devastation so complete as to
disabuse the enemy of any and all notions of pride (in this case Arab
and Muslim pride) and the futility of resisting us. This kind of
psychological change is forced in the enemy only by visiting a defeat
on him that is so horrendous and complete that his very existence is
dependent upon your will. Think of the bombing of Tokyo, and the fire-
storms that followed in 1945. Think of Dresden. It is said that bombs
fell in Dresden until the only effect was to bounce the rubble. Think
of Hiroshima (horrendous as it seems, but can we prevent it from
coming to that sometime in this war?).
If you are familiar with
U.S. history, consider the way we completely drove out the last
Briton (colonialist) from the newly independent United States in
1776, consider the sacking of Atlanta during our Civil War, and the
psychological impact on Southerners of Sherman's March to the Sea.
Unfortunately, these are the necessary atrocities of a successful
military campaign. This is what the history of war teaches: Without a
complete and total annihilation of the enemy, he will never come to
realize the folly of his ways... and he will rise to fight us again.
The point is when and under what circumstances will we be provoked to
carry this war to a decisively successful conclusion. Last time it
was Pearl Harbor, this time if it has not been 9/11, then will it be
a nuke or dirty nuke attack on the West or the US mainland? Or can
better sense prevail in our Administration before that happens?
Penning this article is one attempt towards that objective.
Read this story....
|India - A reliable partner
Pakistan's President Musharraf has promised to rid his unhappy land
of Al-Qaeda ever since 9/11 and before; however, for a complex of
reasons he has been able to do little or nothing to affect this. The
jihad is epidemic in Pakistan. Jihad training camps dot the
landscape – including those that investigators charge that Lodi,
California resident Hamid Hayat attended in 2000, 2003, and 2004.
Hayat allegedly planned to bring the jihad violence he learned there
back to the United States. An Afghan intelligence officer
remarked: "We know where a lot of these training camps are. We have
their names. And we've given the Pakistanis all the information we
have. We're waiting for Pakistan to show the willingness to fight."
He may be in for a long wait. The training camps are not there by
accident: Pakistani madrasas are veritable "universities of jihad."
At least two of the July 7 London bombers attended such madrasas.
Speakers at the UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of
Human Rights recently described them as "nurseries of death and
destruction." Even textbooks approved by Musharraf himself foster
notions about the necessity of Muslims to fight so that Islamic law
will reign supreme. One textbook declares: "At present, jihad is
continuing in different parts of the world. Numerous mujahedin [holy
warriors] of Islam are involved in defending their religion, and
independence, and to help their oppressed brothers across the world."
It isn't on the program: "When God's people are forced
to become slaves of man-made laws, they are hindered from practicing
the religion of their God. When all the legal ways in this regard are
closed, then power should be used to eliminate the evil. If Muslims
are being oppressed, then jihad is necessary to free them from this
cruel oppression." Osama's sentiments exactly. Musharraf recently
ordered foreign students out of Pakistani madrasas, but it is the
Pakistani students who are the problem.
Pakistani mosques are likewise epicenters of Islamic intransigence
and exhortations to violence. After the July 7 bombings, authorities
in Pakistan arrested 56 imams on charges of making "provocative
speeches" during their Friday sermons; ten others were arrested for
selling audiotapes of those sermons. The nation's political system,
meanwhile, is heavily influenced by the notion that Islamic law must
reign supreme in any legitimate state – a principle that forms the
cornerstone of bin Laden's agenda. Osama himself, of course, has most
likely found shelter (and may continue to do so) in the wild
Pakistani highlands. That shelter, of course, is offered and
protected by rank-and-file Pakistanis who share the terrorist
mastermind's outlook on life.
Read this story....
Optional Scenarios if the USA does not decimate Mullah Jihadis of Iran now
What we need to change within us to defeat Islamic Terrorism
Understanding Islamic Terrorism to enable us to destroy it once and
How Iraq can take the
entire Middle East into Apocalypse
A friend or a foe?
What does it
take to win a war against theology-inspired terror?
causes of Muslim Alienation and of 9/11, 3/11, 7/7
Muslims glorify murder and revenge?
and contradictions within the Communist-Islamist Alliance
The real Muslim
mind revealed by an Ex-Muslim
break the Islamist-Communist Alliance
Iran's Mullahs' Desperation to get Nuclear Weapons.
Putin's romance with
Palestinians, Iranians and Syrians - Shades of
Hitler-Stalin (Ribbentrop-Molotov) Pact of 1939?
Iran's Duplicity in
building Nuclear weapons under the cloak of Energy
Requirements recalls Hitler's duplicity of building Luftwaffe using
Vietnam War and
the War on Terror - similarities and differences