This site is dedicated to
frank and fearless reporting and commenting to expose the Islamic
|Monday, October 3, 2005
|Net Gain from the War on
- The simple use of demographics of democracy against our
The Sunni terrorist Zarqawi has openly called for elimination of
Shiites in Iraq. We have not asked the Shiites to fight back, we have
enabled them to fight back, by giving them power, both political
through the demographics of democracy and by training more of them as
security forces (army and police) in Iraq.
The cycle of Shiite-
Sunni violence once started, grows exponentially and would soon spill
outside Iraq. The Saudis are already getting the jitters that the
Iraqi fires will singe them too and they have started making noises
when they come here to pay their respects for the six decade
The only thing which is going in favor of our
adversary are the rising oil prices, along with which rise their oil
revenues and the disposable income available to finance terror
activities as also their clandestine nuclear programs. This is in
part the explanation for the Iranian belligerence on the nuclear
issue. Their is no solution in sight to bring down oil prices, in
fact they would go up further as the oil producing areas become
increasingly disturbed when the military action against Iran begins
in 2006. In the next five years oil prices will peak up, touching
perhaps $300 per barrel when the Mid-East oil supplies go for a toss
when North-eastern province of Saudi Arabia is swept under
secessionist strife. ($ 300 sounds too cruel but this will happen,
can't help it.
And this would be once again our application of
demographics of democracy against our enemy using the case of self-
determination for the Saudi population after we take charge of Saudi
Arabia and enforce an election there. The happenings in Iraq today
will be repeated there, with the Shiites wanting federalism and then
finally secession from Saudi Arabia.
With the oil rich Shiite
province gone, the Saudis will be left high and dry, to prevent which
the Sunnis from the Hejaz (Western Saudi Arabia) will flock to oil
rich Dhahran, AL Khobar in a copycat insurgency that we see in Iraq
In fact it is for their Shiite majority that Dhahran was
the scene of the first terrorist attack in Saudi Arabia in 1995, and
Al Khobar too had a taste of it in 2004. The Saudi situation will go
from the frying pan to the fire once we move into the peninsula to
enforce universal adult franchise. This will set the Shiite cat among
the Saudi pigeons. But this will have to wait till we deal with Iran
and then with Syria.
This occupation of Saudi Arabia in fact would
be our final master-stroke using the alibi of giving the right of
self determination to a Shiite majority of the oil rich North-Eastern
Province of the KSA (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). Before that would be
our venture to bring secularists to power in a Shiite country - Iran
and setting the Mullahs and secularists there at each others throats.
This would be followed by bringing Sunnis to power through the ballot
in a country where the Shiites (Alawites) are in power through the
occupation of Syria starting a Shiite insurgency against the Sunnis
in a reversal of the Iraqi situation! Masterly isn't it? and too good
to be true! But happen it will!
So buddies, this is how we would
divide a house of murderers against itself and make the job of
hunting down all murderers that much easier by making the murderers
murder each other. Just hang around and you will see this happening
in the next half a decade.
The only fly in the ointment could be
our adversaries smelling a rat and cobbling up a few nukes or
pilfering/buying them from the Pakistani military, to be set off in
our ports and cities before the above strategy could run its course,
necessitating a course correction and a fast-forward of the War on
Terror. Will this happen is the million $ question.
Read this story....
|To defeat Islam we need
to emulate Muslims and fight to kill
(Sorry for this gruesome photograph, but this is the reality of Islam). Islamic ferocity made single combat a deathly struggle for its
The Arab Muslims never allowed their adversaries to escape by
retreating. They found sadistic glee in slaughtering their defeated
opponents to the last man.
After the Arabs has slaughtered two
thirds of the Persian army at Qadissiyah, they did not stop, but
continued to march to the Persian capital Ctesiphon (Teesfoon). The
Arabs were not interested in a border war but were intent in
defeating Persia utterly b marching into the nook and corner of that
country. The prize – the Persian capital was the first in their path.
When the Arab hordes started nearing Ctesiphon, the hapless Persian
emperor Yazdgard, who had never thought that such a calamity would
befall him with the barefooted Arab lizard eaters, coming at his
doorstep as victors, sent out an emissary to the advancing Arab
Muslims. The emissary said:
"Our emperor asks if you would be agreeable to peace on the condition
that the Tigris should be the boundary between you and us, so that
whatever is with us on the eastern side of the Tigris remains ours
and whatever you have gained on the western side is yours. And if
this does not satisfy your land hunger, then nothing would satisfy
Saad-ibn-Wagas the Arab Muslim Commander-in-Chief told the emissary
that the Muslims were not hungry for land; and that they were
fighting to convert the Persians to Islam. He added that if the
Persian emperor wanted peace it was open to him to accept Islam, or
to pay Jizya. If both the alternatives were not acceptable then peace
was out of question, and only the sword could decide the issue
between them. This revealed the terminal uncompromising nature of the
The Hapless Persian emperor, withdrew to the fortress of Hulwan, from
there to Rayy and finally to Merv, near the border of the Persian
empire with the land of the Central Asian Turks, where he died
fighting the Muslims in 651 – seventeen years after the Arabs had
first attacked Persia.
The Arab attack on Persia revealed the fatal
nature of the Muslim menace, a factor that remains unchanged till
today. So when fighting the Muslims, either you defeat and completely
and permanently annihilate them, or they will continue to haunt you
and make you embrace that bloodthirsty creed and turn you into
bloodthirsty hounds yourself, baying for the blood of those who are
as yet not Muslim.
The governments of the USA, UK, Russia and
other Western (and Eastern nations) need to recognize the threat of
Jihadi terrorism for what it is, an existential threat. Either you
survive or the Muslims. You cannot negotiate with the Muslims, You
cannot compromise with them, you cannot appease them, while remaining
non-Muslims, you can only fight them to death, either your death or
theirs. And if civilization has to survive, all non-Muslims need to
unite and take Islam to its grave. There s no other escape from the
Islamic challenge to human civilization.
Read this story....
Are Muslims Alienated everywhere as any civilized lifestyle is alien for them?
The effective way of defeating Pre-cultural theology-inspired
Optional Scenarios if the USA does not decimate Mullah Jihadis of
What we need to change within us to defeat Islamic Terrorism
Understanding Islamic Terrorism to enable us to destroy it once and
How Iraq can take the
entire Middle East into Apocalypse
A friend or a foe?
What does it
take to win a war against theology-inspired terror?
causes of Muslim Alienation and of 9/11, 3/11, 7/7
Muslims glorify murder and revenge?
and contradictions within the Communist-Islamist Alliance
The real Muslim
mind revealed by an Ex-Muslim
break the Islamist-Communist Alliance
Iran's Mullahs' Desperation to get Nuclear Weapons.
Putin's romance with
Palestinians, Iranians and Syrians - Shades of
Hitler-Stalin (Ribbentrop-Molotov) Pact of 1939?
Iran's Duplicity in
building Nuclear weapons under the cloak of Energy
Requirements recalls Hitler's duplicity of building Luftwaffe using
Vietnam War and
the War on Terror - similarities and differences