This site is dedicated to
frank and fearless reporting and commenting to expose the Islamic
|Thursday, September 15, 2005
|What happens when Islamist
terror eventually bursts out in the open in European
Many young Muslims in Europe, and some in America, particularly
second- and third-generation Muslims, cannot be considered part of a
diaspora. They no longer are strongly connected to their family's
country of origin, nor do they intend to return.
Instead, they are forming their own Muslim consciousness from the
Internet, books, videotapes and audiotapes.
The Internet offers many radical Islamic "experts" and mullahs who
function like Dear Abby. European Muslims pose questions on
everything from whether to be polite to infidels to how to prepare
for jihad. The immediate answer often is a hodgepodge of Koranic
citations, quotes from ancient scholars and personal advice.
Within this constantly morphing digital environment, an increasingly
radical Islam is emerging in Europe. Disconnected from their
homelands, isolated from their non-Muslim neighbors and fellow
workers, alienated from their elders, Europe's young Muslims find a
weird, disembodied, globalized radical Islam appealing.
Europe's Struggle for survival
Muslim sections of Paris, Rotterdam and other European cities already
are labeled "no-go zones" for ethnic Europeans, including armed
As the Muslim populations -- and their level of cultural and
religious assertiveness -- expand, European geography will
be "reclaimed" for Islam. Europe will become pockmarked with "little
Fallujahs" that effectively will be impenetrable by anything much
short of a U.S. Marine division.
Not only will Islamic cultural aggression against a seemingly passive
and apologetic indigenous population increase, but the zone of safety
and support for the actual terrorists will expand as well.
If the current leaders of Europe do not respond to the Islamist
threat boldly and effectively, the common European people might
decide to defend their culture as vigilantes. In that case, Europe
again will become a bloody urban battleground.
Read this story....
|The beginning of the Jihad
and why Allah has no form
The founder of Islam Mohammed was basically a gangster, who in the
initial stages found followers by waving the carrot of plunder before
them. The first Muslims were those criminals who wanted to loot a
harried and defeated enemy. So the level of morality was quite low,
as also was war discipline. The fact that greed could get the better
of the Muslims was the lesson for Mohammed from the Battle of Uhud.
Henceforth, he made violation of discipline and retreat from a battle
an offense punishable with death. This shows the ruthless character
of Mohammed , who would be merciless with his own followers if they
failed in the objective of defeating an enemy. This coercion played a
no small role in the successive victories the Muslims had. Wherever
the Muslims were defeated, they had to massacred wholesale as
happened at the Battle of Tours in France in 732. The Muslims could
be either victorious or dead. So to defeat the Muslims they need to
be fought to their deaths. A lesson America would do well to bear in
mind in the War of Terror.
Lessons from the conversion of Khalid-bin-Walid
There is another lesson to be learnt from the Battle of Uhud. The
Quraish who were led by Khalid-ibn-Walid, was an inveterate foe of
Mohammed in those days and he almost had killed Mohammed at Uhud, but
after Mohammed through his guile, made the Quriash weaker and finally
overran Mecca, Khalid saw that he could express his ferocity only if
he combined it with the malice and guile of Mohammed and so to
continue his military career, he converted to Islam. After his
conversion Khalid-ibn-Walid became a very fearsome Muslim general who
led the Muslims to victory in the battle of Al Yarmuk against the
Byzantines in 12 A.H. (636 C.E.).
Khalid's conversion and later
success itself tells a tale that in the psychology of the Arabs, only
if the powerful are also the successful and dangerous, they are
respected. Khalid would not have converted to Islam, had he been able
to slay Mohammed.at the battle of the Uhud hill or defeat him
subsequently. Since Khalid could not defeat, Mohammed, he decided
that the best way to ensure success for himself was to join the
Muslims. Before his conversion, Khalid was ferocious like all Arabs,
after his conversion, he also became malicious.
Khalid's story has
another lesson for those who fight the Muslims, that the Muslims only
understand and respect strength and cruelty, they treat magnanimity,
charity and noblesse with contempt.
So we Americans and our
allies, would have to re-invent the cowboy spirit and go for the
scalps of the Muslims. If we Americans want to earn the respect of
the Arab-Muslims, they need to put the fear of death in them. Not
individual death as the Arabs seek it in their martyrdom (genocide
murder) operations, but through mass slaying of the Muslim through
thermo-nuclear attacks, that would wipe out millions of them at one
stroke. There is no other way to defeat the Arab-Muslims.
Read this story....
The effective way of defeating Pre-cultural theology-inspired
Optional Scenarios if the USA does not decimate Mullah Jihadis of
What we need to change within us to defeat Islamic Terrorism
Understanding Islamic Terrorism to enable us to destroy it once and
How Iraq can take the
entire Middle East into Apocalypse
A friend or a foe?
What does it
take to win a war against theology-inspired terror?
causes of Muslim Alienation and of 9/11, 3/11, 7/7
Muslims glorify murder and revenge?
and contradictions within the Communist-Islamist Alliance
The real Muslim
mind revealed by an Ex-Muslim
break the Islamist-Communist Alliance
Iran's Mullahs' Desperation to get Nuclear Weapons.
Putin's romance with
Palestinians, Iranians and Syrians - Shades of
Hitler-Stalin (Ribbentrop-Molotov) Pact of 1939?
Iran's Duplicity in
building Nuclear weapons under the cloak of Energy
Requirements recalls Hitler's duplicity of building Luftwaffe using
Vietnam War and
the War on Terror - similarities and differences